Early Christian America

Dialectics: Agent Provocateur

Lesson 1: Learn this Stuff…Now!

What is Dialectical Attack? Put simply it involves finding (or creating) two sides to a point and moving to CONTROL both sides of the argument. For example, many accuse the two Party System in our country as really being CONTROLLED by the same powers/people. One can see that, if true, the American people would be caught in the middle trying to use lawful means to bring change, being unable to do so. The only thing left would be to recognize the degree of differences, if any, existing between contending parties. Dialectics is the word used today to invoke this “control” of both opposing “positions” in the mind of the population.

The Agent Provocateur is perhaps, the most important individual involved in transforming a free people into a defeated, and if possible, enslaved state. The description below is most important, as it describes the HOW of the “Mole” – a very TRUSTED leader who betrays from within a movement toward which he is opposed.

In the LIST below, some of those individuals responsible for undermining their countries for the Globalist elite are given. (Do a search on the Obama Administration and the CFR).

The Pioneer and Exemplar: Comte d’ Mirabeau – Mirabeau’s work as the quintessential agent provocateur has inspired later revolutionary organizations to use the same approach. Notably, Jan Kozak’s work on “pressure above and below”, utilizes such an approach without mentioning Mirabeau specifically.

Mirabeau worked as a confidante of the King, the Orleanistes, the Duc d’Orleans, and (probably) a merchant-banking house. He had no loyalties to any of the aforesaid individuals, though readily appearing to be of diplomatic, statesmanlike “service” to them (betraying them!) because always in need of funds. Truth of it is, he was a loyal Illuminatus, secretly working with the Jacobins against the King, Duc, and Orleaniste revolutionaries. No surprise that his death was sudden and mysterious, having betrayed so many interests and “friends”.

His real loyalties were “revolutionary” and he despised the Royalty (King Louis XVI and Marie the Queen), the aristocracy (Duc d’Orleans), revolutionaries who wouldn’t go far enough (Orleanistes, whom he led). He was inspired by the writings of Frederick the Great, King of Prussia, who always thought “revolution” was the key to the future. Not unlike autocrats and philosophers of the Communist and Socialist Revolutions throughout the 19th -20th centuries (Stalin, Mao, Marx, Engels, Hegel, Bismarck, Hitler), Frederick saw and admired the powerful changes wrought by the Great Protestant Reformation as “Revolution”.

Frederick’s interest in Revolution as a spiritual and political movement influenced many thinkers of his time. His impatience with traditional affairs of state was echoed by revolutionary poets of the Sturm und Drang. As Billington further put it: “ Radical Bavarian Illuminists urged, in the early 1780s, that his secularizing reforms be carried even further through an ‘immanent revolution of the human mind.’”

Due to his exposure as ambassador of France to the Court of Frederick in Berlin, he was the virus who transported the idea of a more thorough secular revolution to Paris. He incorrectly “predicted” the Revolution would first come to Prussia through the agency of the Illuminati (probably due to the influence of Wollner – see below).

Mirabeau was a firm believer in the strategy made famous by Lenin and Kozak,

To restrict, as a principle, revolutionary actions to pressure from below and to forego pressure from above, is anarchism.

Due to this principle, he helped coordinate both sides of the Revolution – Aristocratic treason at the top, and Revolutionary activism/violence at the “bottom” of the Revolution. Thus, he became all of the following:

• Leader and Journalist: He was both the leader in turning the Third Estate of the Estates-General into a new National Assembly and “the first to succeed in launching a journal without the authorization of the government.

• “Prophet”: He gave the French their taste of “inevitability” by assuming the posture of invincibility, sage, and prophet. In essence, he promoted the idea that what he was leading was “inevitable”. He was the outstanding orator of the Revolution and the pioneer who convinced the French that the Revolution was redemptive in content and eschatology. Christians today do great harm to the Gospel when they teach society that evil will triumph on earth and Christianity will triumph in Heaven… People need to SEE results to believe in principle.

• “Preacher”- effective communicator: He popularized the Illuminatist phrase “revolution of the mind”. As a brilliant orator and communicator he apparently invented the terms “revolutionary”, “counterrevolutionary”, and “counterrevolution”.

• “Apostle” – He was the genius who applied the evocative language of the Christian religion to the Revolutionary process, calling the Estates-General not to “reform” but to “regenerate the nation”. He called the National Assembly “the inviolable priesthood of national policy” and the Declaration of the Rights of Man “a political gospel.”

• “Gospel” – Thus, in the mind of the people of France, he inspired an awe in what was transpiring, raising “Revolutionary justice” and “process” to the pinnacle of God-like authority, far beyond the scope of mere political change and pedantry.

Of the Illuminati, Mirabeau’s first love, and its control of the Jacobins of France who ultimately drove the Revolution to its savage goals, Quintin Craufurd, friend of Marie Antoinette, writing to William Pitt in 1794, remarked:

There is a great resemblance between the maxims , as far as they are known, of the Illumines and the early Jacobins, and I am persuaded that the seeds of many of those extravagant but diabolical doctrines that spread with such unparalleled luxuriance in the hotbeds of France were carried from Germany.

Kerensky: The socialist politician who took the reins of the Russian government in the aftermath of the Czar’s abdication. He controlled the police especially, using them to punish revolutionaries who opposed Lenin. Though “going through the motions” of arresting Bolsheviks, the leadership was always released and only “small fry” were kept. All of this was designed to convince the people he was “opposing” the Bolsheviks. He invariably kept the Russian police and military busy arresting all the wrong people. He endorsed and approved bills which disrupted the economy (hence his socialism), driving the people to despair. Lenin’s revolution was less active overthrow and more economic despair leading to collapse. Unlike Lenin’s clearly stated principle that opponents of the Revolution must be exterminated as examples to the people of the resolve of the new “People’s Government”, Kerensky was awarded both money and goods, being helped actively to leave “into exile.” Rewards go for a job “well done”.

Johann Christof Wöllner (1732 – 1800): A Rosicrucian mystic and a high official in the Illuminati. In 1781 Frederick William of Prussia fell under the influence of Wollner and joined the Rosicrucians. Wollner had a great influence upon the Royal policy as a result of Frederick’s later succession to the throne. Frederick’s uncle, Frederick the Great, after whom Frederick William had succeeded to the throne of Prussia, had described Wollner as a "treacherous and intriguing priest”. The latter designation brings upon him scholarly speculation as to his Jesuit connections so prominently associated in the Illuminati, the organization itself patterned by its Founder, Adam Weishaupt, after the Order of the Jesuits. He later claimed a desire to restore “Christian orthodoxy” throughout Prussia.

August Belmont – Worked secretly for the Rothschilds and managed to guide the financial destiny of the United States in the Post-Civil War era. His influence and counsels within both major political parties helped push them to incite the unnecessary Civil War. Because he was later exposed, agent provocateur and banking agent J.P.Morgan was chosen to fill his “post”. J.P. Morgan became so successful that he took his place beside other Globalist insiders as one of the major “players” in the Globalist circle.

“Colonel” E. Mandell House – Described as President Woodrow Wilson’s “alter ego” it was he who engineered Wilson’s initiatives bringing about America’s involvement in the following:

• First World War
• League of Nations
• One of the architects of the Treaty of Versailles that crippled and embittered Germany.
• He was responsible for pressuring Wilson’s Cabinet into many unconstitutional usurpations of Executive Authority. He is the forerunner of the National Security Advisor, a post filled by members of the CFR especially.
• He was the agent most responsible for prodding initiatives that would necessitate massive injections of “credit”, indebting the United States government to loan programs of Globalist bankers, as never before.
• He was responsible for offsetting opposition to the early rise and success of the Federal Reserve System. In short, he helped “legitimize” its presence to the public within the Wilson Administration.

Jan Smuts – Hero to the brave people of South Africa who gained fame as the leader against British opposition in the Boer War. Helped in the highest esteem by his countrymen, few knew he was the agent of the Insider Banking Houses of Europe. His involvement:

• Honored member of the R.I.I.A – the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the British version of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a brain-child of the Rhodes-Milner alliance which had provoked the Boer War, so as to humble the Africaners (Boers), and gain dominion over their gold and diamond holdings. Ironically (?), Smuts gained his reputation and the love of his people by his legendary exploits against the British usurpers in that tragic, usurping war.
• Jan Smuts helped write the Covenant of the League of Nations (forerunner of the United Nations) He was accompanied in the task by Lord Robert Cecil, Lord Phillimore, and Alfred Zimmern.

However, the powerful British politician, Lord Cecil, recognized such a body must be given 1) economic authority to impose sanctions, 2) political authority to delay events sufficiently until the League could act in matters, and 3) military authority to override opposition to the League’s demands. Smuts agreed to Cecil’s positions as a member of the Milner Group and Milner’s “Roundtable” (Group responsible for forming the infamous CFR and R.I.I.A.). Cecil’s position became the position of the Roundtable officially in December, 1918 (one month after the close of World War I).

- Submitted, Wayne C. Sedlak, ICHR

Copyrighted Article Reproduction by Permission Only A&D Net Enterprises, Ltd.